A
Message from Chamber CEO Douglass Wilhoit:
Stockton being made to
pay
for State's Mistakes
SEPTEMBER
2008 -
While
I sat at my computer planning my September Port O Call article and
deciding how to express to all of you the sinking and sickening feeling I
have about the quarter century of “dereliction of duty” of the
Executive and Legislative Branches of the Government of California, in
regards to the ongoing issue of the State’s dysfunctional prison system,
my level of my frustration raised to an even higher level. I was first
tempted to revisit what I have written before of the history of the
Women’s Prison. By now you should all know it is being transformed into
a Men’s Re-entry Facility (Prison)!
I
also wanted to share with you how the State Government (at all levels) has
violated its own laws and the people of this County in regards to this
issue. I also dredged up my old frustrations with State Government while
on the San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors and during those 16 years
having the privilege of working with the California State Association of
Counties (CSAC) culminating by being CSAC President in 1994. I lost track
of all the times the CSAC Board, staff and I warned and pleaded with the
Governor’s office and leaders of both Houses of the Legislature to
properly plan for the coming of a prison crisis. This futile effort
started back in the middle 1980’s.
It
is now “WE TOLD YOU SO TIME!” At last count, California’s state
prison system holds over 170,000 prisoners in a system designed for
83,000, and most California prisons currently hold populations more than
double their design capacity.
To
“try” to meet this self-made disaster the state has progressively been
forced to manage this overcrowded system year by year through various
workarounds, including referring nonviolent drug offenders to special
“drug courts” that mandate treatment rather than incarceration (Prop
36), early releases of prisoners, trying to raise non-existent funds to
build more prisons, and transfers of prisoners to the federal system or
out-of –state privately run institutions with whom the state has
contracted. I submit this is all due to hiding their heads in the sand –
quicksand I hasten to add.
The
correctional healthcare system and several of its institutions have been
found inadequate or “inhumane” by federal courts in successive cases,
which have resulted in the correctional system to be placed under special
Federal Court oversight. This is what I want to fully bring to your
attention.
On
Thursday August 7, 2008 Chamber President Goldstrand called a special
board meeting in regards to the “proposed” California Health Care
Facility (PRISON) to be placed at a site on the Northern California Youth
Correctional Center (NCYCC) in STOCKTON. The meeting was well attended by
board members and leaders in the community from many disciplines. URS/Bovis
representative Laura Sainz, CEQA project manager for the California Prison
Receivership (CPR), and a representative from the court appointed receiver
were present. It was a spirited and frustrating meeting since more
questions than answers were the end result.
No
answers on the anticipated and real impact on Law Enforcement county wide,
Court system, Coroner’s Office, all the hospitals in the county, mental
health treatment programs, drug and alcohol programs, doctors, nurses and
all other social services that will be impacted at a cost to our residents
for the benefit of convicted felons.
On
August
12, 2008
I received a Revised Notice of Preparation (NOP) For An Environmental
Impact Report(EIR) for the project. I will give you the scary highlights
and at the end will ask you to voice your concerns and disgust with the
whole issue.
The
EIR will include such items as visual resources,
agriculture resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural
resources, noise, population and housing, public services, recreation,
transportation/traffic to name just a few. (I see all these as quality of
life issues for our residents now and into the future!) In the document it
states, “it is anticipated that trustee and responsible agencies will
rely on the EIR when considering issuing their applicable permit(s) or
other approvals for the “proposed” project.” Don’t you believe it
because this is all done under a Federal Court Order and the state will
hide behind this excuse and take short cuts ignoring important mitigations
to get out of their own mess and at the expense of the City of Stockton
and the County of San Joaquin!
Now
to the description of this “project,” “ In accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the California Prison Health
Care Receivership (CPR) will be preparing an EIR to “evaluate” the
environmental (no mention of community wellbeing and quality of life)
effects associated with development of a new medical care facility with up
to 1,800 beds (note more beds than all of our public and private hospitals
combined) on a 144.2 acre site (the former site of CYA Karl Holton
Facility closed in 2003).”
“In
order to fulfill a 2005 mandate from the Federal Court, CPR has been
tasked with the statewide construction of up to seven (four in Southern
California and three in Northern California) health care facilities, which
CPR estimates will provide approximately 10,000 medical and mental health
patient beds.
“The
proposed project (Stockton) represents one of the seven facilities to be
constructed over the next three years.” Note: Keep in mind there is more
land at the CYA property with the recent closure of DeWitt Nelson (about
the same land mass as Karl Holton) so what will keep the CPR from looking
at this as more land to place one of the remaining two facilities planned
in Northern California?
“Since
the release of the original NOP dated June 16, 2008, CPR’s program at
the Stockton NCYCC site has been “further refined.” Particular
attention has been given to the staffing needs of this facility. The
refinements do not change the total number of beds (my note: yet) proposed
(1,800) at the project site, but do require a substantial
increase in the proposed number of staff that would work (commute to) the
site. Compared to 1,890 staff as indicated in the original NOP, the
proposed project will now involve 3,030 staff. The staffing increase is
due to the fine tuning of the medical and mental health programs, as well
as a review of the staffing needs for a facility that includes both men
and women. The bed count of 1,800 will continue to include half mental
health and half medical patients.”
Now
what will the facility look like? At the August 7th meeting,
the presenters were very proud that the facility will have a “Community
College Campus Look!” From the August 12th NOP, “The
facility would consist of housing clusters, diagnostic and treatment
centers, an armory, warehouse facilities, a central plant, outdoor
recreation fields, a gatehouse, a regional kitchen facility and parking. A
LETHAL ELECTRIFIED FENCE would surround the secured area, a sally port
would be incorporated into the fencing, and GUARD TOWERS, at a minimum
would be located at each corner and at the vehicle sally port.
“The
project also included exterior lighting (note: a beacon to the world of
prison central). Parking would be provided for staff personnel and
visitors” (note: families of convicted criminals).” On and off-site
infrastructure improvements would be installed. The proposed medical care
facility (note: call if what you want but it is still a PRISON) would
employ up to 3,030 staff and approximately 75 to 100 visitors are
anticipated per day.”
The
NOP allows comments to be presented no later than September 11, 2008.
PLEASE SEND ANY AND ALL COMMENTS TO CEQA PROJECT MANAGER, LAURA SAINZ, URS/BOVIS
LEND LEASE JOINT VENTURE, 2400 Del Paso Road, Suite 255, Sacramento,
California 95834. Phone number is (916) 779-6409 and email is laura.sainz@ursblljv.com.
Since
this is a Federal Court action brought on by LONG TERM DERELICTION OF DUTY
IN THE STATE CAPITOL, it is imperative that your voice is heard loud and
clear! I do believe that the community must resist something like this
being jammed down our throats, so please take a moment and state your
views to Ms. Sainz.

|